2019 February Contest -- Final Results

The 2019 February contest featured algorithmic programming problems covering a wide range of techniques and levels of difficulty.

A total of 4317 distinct users logged into the contest during its 4-day span. A total of 3582 participants submitted at least one solution, hailing from 67 different countries:

 2261 USA  583 CHN   63 VNM   63 CAN   59 KOR   52 MYS   46 ROU
   46 BLR   31 RUS   28 IND   25 FRA   21 AUS   19 TWN   19 BGD
   19 ARM   17 UKR   12 POL   12 MEX   12 IRN   11 GBR   10 SLV
   10 MNG   10 HRV    9 SGP    9 ITA    9 DEU    7 KGZ    7 BGR
    6 ZAF    6 SYR    6 JPN    6 FIN    6 COL    5 TUR    5 TKM
    5 LTU    5 KAZ    5 HUN    5 GEO    5 EST    4 TJK    4 HKG
    3 TUN    3 THA    3 GRC    3 EGY    3 AZE    2 PRT    2 NZL
    2 NGA    2 ARG    1 VEN    1 SVN    1 SRB    1 PRK    1 NLD
    1 MDA    1 ISR    1 IRL    1 GRD    1 ECU    1 CUB    1 CMR
    1 CHE    1 BRA    1 BEL    1 ABW
In total, there were 8304 graded submissions, broken down by language as follows:

 2938 Java
 2717 C++11
 1768 C++
  700 Python 3.4.0
  114 Python 2.7.6
   56 C
   11 Pascal

Below are the detailed results for each of the platinum, gold, silver, and bronze contests. You will also find solutions and test data for each problem, and by clicking on any problem you can practice re-submitting solutions in "analysis mode". If you are logged in, you will also see your own specific results below alongside the contest(s) you took.

USACO 2019 February Contest, Platinum

The platinum division had 451 total participants, of whom 349 were pre-college students. Full results are here. Congratulations to all of the top participants for their excellent results!

1

Cow Dating
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

2

Moorio Kart
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

3

Mowing Mischief
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

USACO 2019 February Contest, Gold

The gold division had 874 total participants, of whom 734 were pre-college students. This particular contest was quite challenging, and as a result, all competitors who scored 650 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the platinum division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here. Note that the test data for the cowland problem was strengthened a bit prior to final grading.

1

Cow Land
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

2

Dishwashing
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

3

Painting the Barn
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

USACO 2019 February Contest, Silver

The silver division had 1067 total participants, of whom 900 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 750 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the gold division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

1

Sleepy Cow Herding
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

2

Painting the Barn
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

3

The Great Revegetation
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

USACO 2019 February Contest, Bronze

The bronze division had 2162 total participants, of whom 1707 were pre-college students. All competitors who scored 750 or higher on this contest are automatically promoted to the silver division. Detailed results for all those promoted are here.

1

Sleepy Cow Herding
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

2

The Great Revegetation
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

3

Measuring Traffic
View problem  |   Test data   |   Solution

Final Remarks

The 2018-2019 season is nearly finished! -- just the US Open contest to go. This contest went quite smoothly; there were no technical issues or issues with problem clarity. Score distributions all look in line with expectations and historical trends. Perhaps the hardest division this time around was the gold division, which had a slightly more genererous promotion cutoff.

For those not yet promoted, remember that the more practice you get, the better your algorithmic coding skills will become -- please keep at it! USACO contests are designed to challenge even the very best students, and it can take a good deal of hard work to excel at them. To help you fix any bugs in your code, you can now re-submit your solutions and get feedback from the judging server using "analysis mode".

A large number of people contribute towards the quality and success of USACO contests. Those who helped with this contest include Dhruv Rohatgi, Matt Fontaine, Ethan Guo, Matthew Fahrbach, Nick Wu, Charles Bailey, George Xing, Spencer Compton, Mark Gordon, and Avichal Goel. Thanks also to our translators and to Clemson CCIT for providing our contest infrastructure. Finally, we are grateful to the USACO sponsors for their generous support: D.E. Shaw, Jump Trading, TwoSigma, and Ansatz Capital.

We look forward to seeing everyone again for the US Open contest.

Happy coding!

- Brian Dean ([email protected])
Director, USA Computing Olympiad