Processing math: 68%

USACO 2024 January Contest, Silver

Problem 1. Cowmpetency


Contest has ended.

Log in to allow submissions in analysis mode


Farmer John is hiring a new herd leader for his cows. To that end, he has interviewed N (2N105) cows for the position. After interviewing the ith candidate, he assigned the candidate an integer "cowmpetency" score ci ranging from 1 to C inclusive (1C109) that is correlated with their leadership abilities.

Because he has interviewed so many cows, Farmer John does not remember all of their cowmpetency scores. However, he does remembers Q (1Q<N) pairs of numbers (aj,hj) where cow hj was the first cow with a strictly greater cowmpetency score than cows 1 through aj (so 1aj<hjN).

Farmer John now tells you the sequence c1,,cN (where ci=0 means that he has forgotten cow i's cowmpetency score) and the Q pairs of (aj,hj). Help him determine the lexicographically smallest sequence of cowmpetency scores consistent with this information, or that no such sequence exists! A sequence of scores is lexicographically smaller than another sequence of scores if it assigns a smaller score to the first cow at which the two sequences differ.

Each input contains T (1T20) independent test cases. The sum of N across all test cases is guaranteed to not exceed 3105.

INPUT FORMAT (input arrives from the terminal / stdin):

The first line contains T, the number of independent test cases. Each test case is described as follows:
  1. First, a line containing N, Q, and C.
  2. Next, a line containing the sequence c1,,cN (0ciC).
  3. Finally, Q lines each containing a pair (aj,hj). It is guaranteed that all aj within a test case are distinct.

OUTPUT FORMAT (print output to the terminal / stdout):

For each test case, output a single line containing the lexicographically smallest sequence of cowmpetency scores consistent with what Farmer John remembers, or 1 if such a sequence does not exist.

SAMPLE INPUT:

1
7 3 5
1 0 2 3 0 4 0
1 2
3 4
4 5

SAMPLE OUTPUT:

1 2 2 3 4 4 1
We can see that the given output satisfies all of Farmer John's remembered pairs.

  • max, c_2 = 2 and 1<2 so the first pair is satisfied
  • \max(c_1,c_2,c_3) = 2, c_4 = 3 and 2<3 so the second pair is satisfied
  • \max(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4) = 3, c_5 = 4 and 3<4 so the third pair is satisfied
There are several other sequences consistent with Farmer John's memory, such as
1 2 2 3 5 4 1
1 2 2 3 4 4 5
However, none of these are lexicographically smaller than the given output.

SAMPLE INPUT:

5
7 6 10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5 6
6 7
8 4 9
0 0 0 0 1 6 0 6
1 3
6 7
4 7
2 3
2 1 1
0 0
1 2
10 4 10
1 2 0 2 1 5 8 6 0 3
4 7
1 2
5 7
3 7
10 2 8
1 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0
4 6
6 9

SAMPLE OUTPUT:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 1 2 6 1 6 7 6
-1
1 2 5 2 1 5 8 6 1 3
-1

In test case 3, since C=1, the only potential sequence is

1 1
However, in this case, cow 2 does not have a greater score than cow 1, so we cannot satisfy the condition.

In test case 5, a_1 and h_1 tell us that cow 6 is the first cow to have a strictly greater score than cows 1 through 4. Therefore, the largest score for cows 1 through 6 is that of cow 6: 5. Since cow 7 has a score of 7, cow 7 is the first cow to have a greater score than cows 1 through 6. So, the second statement that cow 9 is the first cow to have a greater score than cows 1 through 6 cannot be true.

SCORING:

  • Input 3 satisfies N \leq 10 and Q, C \leq 4.
  • Inputs 4-8 satisfy N \leq 1000.
  • Inputs 9-12 satisfy no additional constraints.

Problem credits: Suhas Nagar

Contest has ended. No further submissions allowed.